(W2) WEB 2.0's popular terms

Web 2.0

  • The read/ write web that allows user contributions, information sharing, collaboration and content remixing.
  • Implying a shift in how the internet is used in the 21st century, web 2.0 is characterized by user-generated content. In other words, users play an active role to participate in the experience (producing/ evaluating content, etc.) instead of just passively viewing the information.
  • Examples: social media (instagram, facebook, twitter, tiktok, etc.), self-publishing platforms (substack, wordpress, medium, etc.), apps (zoom, netflix, spotify, etc.)

Crowdsourcing

Through web 2.0, individuals collective share resources to meet a common goal, whether that goal be knowledge-based or financial.

Produsage

A core user-led activity where users take both roles of using and producing content.

Digital Native

Those born and grown up in the digital world are “native speakers” of the digital language of computers, video games and the Internet.

Digital Immigrant

Those fascinated by and adopting many aspects of the new technology later in their life.

Generation Alpha

Kids born between 2010 and 2024 are part of Generation Alpha. Generation Alpha is the first generation of kids who will never know a time when social media didn't exist, and they are far more tech-savvy than any generation previously

Reference:

Kenton, W. (2023, July 30). What Is Web 2.0? Definition, Impact, and Examples. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/w/web-20.asp. 

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6.

Bruns, A. (2011). Beyond difference: Reconfiguring education for the user-led age. In R. Land & S. Bayne (eds.), Digital Difference (pp. 131-144). Brill Sense. 

Cottrell, S. (2024, January 30). A year-by-year Guide to the Different Generations. Parents. https://www.parents.com/parenting/better-parenting/style/generation-names-and-years-a-cheat-sheet-for-parents/.




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

(W3) Community of Practice Frameworks

Image
       Community of Practice (CoP) has captured my attention this week. Its applications are popular in various disciplines, as a means of   fostering both individual and group knowledge within a social learning system. According to Donald (2015), CoPs have three fundamental elements: a ‘domain’ of activity or knowledge that creates a sense of common identity, the ‘community’ who are the members who care about that domain, and the shared ‘practice’ developed by community.     I am particularly interested in guideline of building and sustaining a CoP, which is applicable for my future design work and enhancing efficiency of current learning groups that I am facilitating. My post includes some helpful frameworks that I detected in related research and handbooks of the topic.     This CoP Lifecycle is suggested by Adams et al. (2023) to guide the step-by-step design and facilitation of CoP with actionable strategies. Their guiding questions in each step are also thought-provoking in devi
Read more

(W3) Do we communicate differently in LinkedIn, Facebook, Blog, and so on?

     It is interesting to find myself naturally changing the tone of voice in different channels. Observing how others communicate in each channel (making a new post, having a reply or reaction), I learn their norms to adapt myself. It is similar to how we adapt to various offline environments to express oneself and perceive others, whether it is a party, a job interview, or a casual neighbor discourse.     In LinkedIn, my writing sounds formal and professional. The tone of voice is quite similar as the one used in my Canvas discussions: respectful and formal. I rarely use emoji to express emotions. Abbreviations or slangs are also not used frequently. The content in LinkedIn is also profession related, conveying facts, updates, or lessons. In Facebook, I feel more freedom to express feelings through emojis, replies and words. Content also plays around emotions behind, ranging from personal stories to opinions. Even job-related content conveys emotions (pride, disappointment, etc.).   
Read more

(W2) Instructional design strategies for digital native learners

 I have been coming up with some ideas of how we, as instructional designers, can cater learning experiences to digital native learners.  Some characteristics of digital native students were listed by Prensky (2001). As digital natives are used to receiving information really fast, content duration should be minimal and optimized by respective channels. For example, below 3 minutes is advised for youtube video; below 1 minute is for tiktok videos; or below 20 seconds should be for facebook stories. Digital native also prefer graphics before text, which highlights the importance of multimedia content creation in learning in replace of traditional text-based format. They function best when networked. Therefore, group work, collaborative knowledge construction and discussions are collaborative activities that can facilitate their learning nature. Additionally, digital native learners prefer games to “serious” work. That paves the way for more informal learning activities and content throu
Read more